Search found 425 matches
- Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:46 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Campaign system proposal (no RISK)
- Replies: 29
- Views: 15023
Re: Campaign system proposal (no RISK)
Since this seems to be the campaign discussion thread I wanted to ask people a question. Do you: 1) Want to play each BF4 map once a campaign? or 2) Want to play the best ~10-20 BF4 maps several times a campaign? I could never play Flood Zone ever again and I would be a happy man. If I could only pl...
- Sat Jan 10, 2015 6:49 pm
- Forum: BRUMMIE's Tavern
- Topic: Come Join In Some Poker
- Replies: 13
- Views: 5706
Re: Come Join In Some Poker
What if di is also doing the right thing?
WHAT THEN
Wish I could lose some fake monies to you all. Poker is fun except for the part where I suck.
WHAT THEN
Wish I could lose some fake monies to you all. Poker is fun except for the part where I suck.
- Thu Jan 08, 2015 4:02 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: BF4C5: What do YOU want to see?
- Replies: 56
- Views: 24077
Re: BF4C5: What do YOU want to see?
Cool. Or campaign timeline should be up soon now that generals have been selected. Hopefully we'll hit the sweet spot.
- Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:09 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: BF4C5 ETA
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5071
Re: BF4C5 ETA
Please see thread: viewtopic.php?f=309&t=25653
- Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:09 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: BF4C5: What happened to the vote?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2530
BF4C5: What happened to the vote?
As you all have noticed, the break was not a productive time in terms of moving the campaign forward. This post will attempt to give full transparency to what happened and why. The voting took place as planned and went as smoothly as could be expected. Just before the voting closed, concerns were ra...
- Tue Jan 06, 2015 8:52 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: BF4C5 ETA
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5071
Re: BF4C5 ETA
Woahkay, hold on gentlemen. Reserving this post for official explanation.
- Sun Dec 14, 2014 8:57 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The "Balance" Problem (Survey Feedback)
- Replies: 58
- Views: 25773
Re: The "Balance" Problem (Survey Feedback)
Yep, that's the tradeoff. Recruitment becomes an important part of winning the campaign. I'd like to give it a shot, but you guys are right that it would be a major shift in how things work. We've deliberately avoided it until now, on the assumption that it would disrupt our carefully crafted army b...
- Sat Dec 13, 2014 5:40 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: BF4C5: Generals Discusion
- Replies: 39
- Views: 19952
Re: BF4C5: Generals Discusion
Feel free to use this thread to pressure people who haven't signed up
- Sat Dec 13, 2014 3:52 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The "Balance" Problem (Survey Feedback)
- Replies: 58
- Views: 25773
Re: The "Balance" Problem (Survey Feedback)
cancel_man: Attendance is essentially a random number in your skill formula. Each campaign it changes dramatically for people. Even the player themselves isn't a good source for this - we could write a script to compare sign ups/attendance versus what people said in their draft card, and I'm willing...
- Sat Dec 13, 2014 2:21 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The "Balance" Problem (Survey Feedback)
- Replies: 58
- Views: 25773
Re: The "Balance" Problem (Survey Feedback)
I second Gwynzer's motion! Great discussion guys, keep it up. I hate to say it, but all of this has happened before (cue Cylon music). The primary determining factor in army balance is attendance. You can break yourself trying to come up with a perfectly balanced army, and it might be balanced for a...
- Thu Dec 11, 2014 8:12 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The "Balance" Problem (Survey Feedback)
- Replies: 58
- Views: 25773
Re: The "Balance" Problem (Survey Feedback)
Kilo, thanks for the analysis of the other communities. If we really want to improve, we have to look outside for ideas. If other communities can pull in big numbers, then we ought to be able to as well. We have to change how we look at recruitment and how we sell ourselves. That starts, of course, ...
- Thu Dec 11, 2014 8:05 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: BF4C5 Campaign Startup: We need you!
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5895
BF4C5 Campaign Startup: We need you!
Another campaign has come to a close here at GC (congratulations SAD), and with that the planning for the next begins. We're going to do some things different this time around, and we'll need your help to do them! First, our Generals for the next campaign will be selected by you, the community. All ...
- Fri Nov 14, 2014 8:23 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: BF4 Bullshit
- Replies: 236
- Views: 83331
Re: BF4 Bullshit
Because in Sweden the military shoots bullets out of their foreheads
- Sun Nov 02, 2014 8:04 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Scrim feedback
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7325
Re: Scrim feedback
I not sure I understand some of your feedback: - An "attack" starts when the attacker declares how many divisions they're attacking with (limited to 2 by the risk rules), and continues until they've lost all of them or the defender has lost all of theirs. I don't understand how this leads ...
- Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:53 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Reminder: Scrim 1 tomorrow
- Replies: 55
- Views: 25087
Re: Reminder: Scrim 1 tomorrow
We had this thread a while back. The "problem" is simple: the community is not as engaged as it was in the past. There's less activity, less sign ups, less everything since we swapped to BF4. People look back on some past campaigns and say, "Man that was fun when we all tried so hard ...