http://www.infosniper.net/index.php?ip_ ... om_level=7
Gameservers. Hmmmm, I'm starting to see a pattern here without even joining a server.
Dallas, TX.
Texas is a bit further than Chicago for our EU brothers. Maybe we can get a few of them to try these servers and leave feedback about ping and any lag. But it would be friendlier to the few SA members that have joined us this campaign.
NA server #2 pub play Feedback
Moderator: Executive
Re: NA server #2 pub play Feedback
We have South African members?Ash2Dust wrote:Texas is a bit further than Chicago for our EU brothers. Maybe we can get a few of them to try these servers and leave feedback about ping and any lag. But it would be friendlier to the few SA members that have joined us this campaign.
I've used Gameservers in the past and they've been OK, not great but not terrible either. Never had a 64 player server with them though.
Clicky to become a Voteable member.
“…so realistic, it'll have you picking shrapnel out of your backside.”
Re: NA server #2 pub play Feedback
Central and South America
-
StarfisherEcho
- Executive
- Posts: 3037
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 2:24 pm
Re: NA server #2 pub play Feedback
Just got done with half one of today's battle day, playing on the NY server: http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/se ... ct-org-NY/
Occasional spikes, but generally, I didn't notice the lag at all.
Occasional spikes, but generally, I didn't notice the lag at all.
Re: NA server #2 pub play Feedback
yes. the NY server yesterday was leagues better than what we were playing on the battleday prior (Feb 25th)
Re: NA server #2 pub play Feedback
ironically the server we played on on Feb 28th was also located in NY, just the server providers were different and consequently hardware was differentJuffalo wrote:yes. the NY server yesterday was leagues better than what we were playing on the battleday prior (Feb 25th)
