GC Tournament #4 - CONGRATS TO DIE GIWENNATOREN!

Discuss the campaign and all things BF.

Moderator: Executive

wizekraker
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 4:42 pm

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3

Post by wizekraker »

Next poll : should free cam be implemented?
User avatar
Necromancer
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Posts: 3315
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3

Post by Necromancer »

Bock wrote:Is it possible to change one's vote?

For what it's worth, I think squad rush would be better and/or more fun for most people.

1) It's easier to make up strategies on the fly (which would benefit random squads) because
2) You play in closer proximity to your squadmates/objectives aren't so spread out, therefore
3) You won't have one person watching highway on Grand Bazaar the whole game, therefore
4) It's somewhat less dependent on individual skill.
i don't vote because i don't care, but i see it differently bock.

for rush, its
1) harder to make strategies on the fly because the objective is known to both sides and all of its (3) routes.
3) you won't have one person watching highway on Grandbazaar but you will have the entier enemy team watch a single corridor, therefore
4) its somewhat more dependent on individual skill because you won't be able to take an objective if theres LoA sitting on it, and you can't go around it.
Image
-“Regret your helplessness…and feel despair.”
Achievement Unlocked: Battlefield 4 Uninstalled!!
User avatar
Chemical2
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Posts: 687
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:37 am

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3

Post by Chemical2 »

Necromancer wrote:
Bock wrote:Is it possible to change one's vote?

For what it's worth, I think squad rush would be better and/or more fun for most people.

1) It's easier to make up strategies on the fly (which would benefit random squads) because
2) You play in closer proximity to your squadmates/objectives aren't so spread out, therefore
3) You won't have one person watching highway on Grand Bazaar the whole game, therefore
4) It's somewhat less dependent on individual skill.
i don't vote because i don't care, but i see it differently bock.

for rush, its
1) harder to make strategies on the fly because the objective is known to both sides and all of its (3) routes.
3) you won't have one person watching highway on Grandbazaar but you will have the entier enemy team watch a single corridor, therefore
4) its somewhat more dependent on individual skill because you won't be able to take an objective if theres LoA sitting on it, and you can't go around it.
1) I don't think it is harder but 5v5 has indeed more options.
2) Both depend on your strategie.
3) Individual skill will always be a factor and since the maps are a bit bigger and the teams too it will play a smaller roll but i don't think we should let it stop us.
''Be polite, be efficient. Have a plan to kill everyone you meet.'' The sniper
BF3
C2: Staff Sergeant - Hitcorp
C3: 1st Lieutenant - Dark army
C4: 1st Lieutenant - Starfishers coffee initiative
C5: PFC - Legion of Doom
User avatar
RazY70
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Posts: 1134
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:24 pm

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW

Post by RazY70 »

Honestly it doesn't really matter to me which game mode we're playing as long as it's fun and not taken too seriously. I prefer CQ simply because it's more familiar to me and therefore more enjoyable :thumbup:
Image
LoA
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Posts: 445
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 7:48 pm

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3

Post by LoA »

wizekraker wrote:Next poll : should free cam be implemented?
Next question: Why not? :?
wizekraker
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 4:42 pm

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3

Post by wizekraker »

LoA wrote:
wizekraker wrote:Next poll : should free cam be implemented?
Next question: Why not? :?
I dont have problem with it..other might though.
User avatar
haruky
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Posts: 2240
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 4:53 am

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW

Post by haruky »

This is a really really close poll. I'm going to leave it running for a few more days.

On the other hand, please continue signing up! We have nearly 50 votes but only about 25 people signed up. It takes literally 10 seconds. (All I ask is for your name)

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1lvnPxA ... 54fGo/edit
Last edited by haruky on Tue May 14, 2013 7:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image[/url]
V_
Posts: 1720
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:13 pm

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW

Post by V_ »

Is this form different from the original one? Also, says I need permission to read it.

Can we get the option to change our votes? I wanna change mine from Conquest to Rush.
BF3 C2: KI - Sgt | C3: Pride - Sgt | C4: Gladius - Sgt | C5: KART - Col | C6: UNSC - Col
RS2:V C1: A1 - Ofc | C2: SLOTH - HC
Image
User avatar
haruky
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Posts: 2240
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 4:53 am

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW

Post by haruky »

BlackIce wrote:Is this form different from the original one? Also, says I need permission to read it.

Can we get the option to change our votes? I wanna change mine from Conquest to Rush.
It is officialy 25-25 on conquest and rush then.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1lvnPxA ... 54fGo/edit Here's the form. I made a small oopsies.
Image[/url]
Juffalo
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 7:54 pm

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW

Post by Juffalo »

Have we had a discussion about 4v4 vs 5v5 for conquest (which it looks like we'll be doing)

5v5 is probably better suited to conquest. I believe that is the competitive standard.
Image
User avatar
haruky
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Posts: 2240
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 4:53 am

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW

Post by haruky »

Juffalo wrote:Have we had a discussion about 4v4 vs 5v5 for conquest (which it looks like we'll be doing)

5v5 is probably better suited to conquest. I believe that is the competitive standard.
Not yet.

So far we have 25 for Conquest and 26 for Squad Rush (2 people changed their vote from Conquest to Squad Rush)
Image[/url]
User avatar
undrt0w
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Posts: 1493
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:23 pm
Location: Bulgaria

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW

Post by undrt0w »

any decision on the date? is it going to be on the 25th or 1st of June? 8)
Image
Welcome Committee Member
What is GC? | Getting Started at GC | Campaign Sign-up Video | FAQ | Forum Netiquette

New Members do you need help?
Find me on TS or send me a PM
MisterInsane
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:46 am

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW

Post by MisterInsane »

Why am not in the sign-ups ?I so much want to play 5v5 with you guys :)
wizekraker
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 4:42 pm

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW

Post by wizekraker »

Yeah same here, I signed up and yet..
User avatar
Jokerle
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Posts: 1986
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:13 pm
Location: latest crashsite

Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW

Post by Jokerle »

und3rt0w wrote:any decision on the date? is it going to be on the 25th or 1st of June? 8)
Wat ne Wuchtbrumme!
Post Reply