That is the most frustrating part.
Once a carrier gets breached almost no point in playing anywhere else.
Naval Strike Released!
Moderator: Executive
-
CorranHorn
- Supporting Member
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:53 pm
Re: Naval Strike Released!
right, unless you have all the flags on the land you will not kill the enemy carrier with missiles fast enough be for the M-COMs are downed.
And the layout inside the carrier in BF2 was way more detailed (if I remember correctly), as was the shipdesign in the singleplayer scenarios.
And the layout inside the carrier in BF2 was way more detailed (if I remember correctly), as was the shipdesign in the singleplayer scenarios.
Re: Naval Strike Released!
Yer. CA is disapointing for me at the moment.
Too fast to get the shields down. (In 2142 there were 5 silos and it took between 3x-5x longer to take out the shields). The silos were also a lot harder to cap... the cap ranges on the maps I've played have been massive. Once you're in the carrier it's just crap. Paradrop spawn, inabiltiy to defend. Shallow objectives "arm A, wait 20 seconds. Wait a bit, arm B". Too few objectives. Broken doors in the carrier. It's all silly.
I think many of the issues could be solved with a patch. We'll wait and see what happens.
Too fast to get the shields down. (In 2142 there were 5 silos and it took between 3x-5x longer to take out the shields). The silos were also a lot harder to cap... the cap ranges on the maps I've played have been massive. Once you're in the carrier it's just crap. Paradrop spawn, inabiltiy to defend. Shallow objectives "arm A, wait 20 seconds. Wait a bit, arm B". Too few objectives. Broken doors in the carrier. It's all silly.
I think many of the issues could be solved with a patch. We'll wait and see what happens.
-
Darkrider312
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 12:16 am
Re: Naval Strike Released!
Played only for like an hour or less. Can't say too much other than the SR338 really does suck after trying out. I knew it stat-wise, but I still wanted to try it out. Needs a massive buff already.
BF3 C3: PRIDe Private [PI4i]
BF3 C4: STAR Private 2 [SIM2]
BF3 C5: LOD Private [LLE1]
BF3 C6: SCAR Specialist [SISp]
BF4 C1: ALLIES Private First Class [ADOG]
BF4 C2: 9th MU Private [9MU]
BF4 C3: TCF Private First Class [TCF]
BF3 C4: STAR Private 2 [SIM2]
BF3 C5: LOD Private [LLE1]
BF3 C6: SCAR Specialist [SISp]
BF4 C1: ALLIES Private First Class [ADOG]
BF4 C2: 9th MU Private [9MU]
BF4 C3: TCF Private First Class [TCF]
Re: Naval Strike Released!
DICE and their incredible knowledge about balancing that goes outside human boundaries.
With this, I present you (and I hope that the guy who posted this made a mistake somewhere):
@Reddit:
On Carrier Assault Large on Lost Islands the US side has 1 extra attack boat and a Little Bird. Needless to say, this puts the China side in a very unbalanced situation every time.
http://imgur.com/a/OHnIz
DICE just reached a new level on patch testing.
With this, I present you (and I hope that the guy who posted this made a mistake somewhere):
@Reddit:
On Carrier Assault Large on Lost Islands the US side has 1 extra attack boat and a Little Bird. Needless to say, this puts the China side in a very unbalanced situation every time.
http://imgur.com/a/OHnIz
DICE just reached a new level on patch testing.
-
knorren
- Supporting Member
- Posts: 654
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 7:11 pm
- Location: The Aland Islands, DeMilitarised Zone
Re: Naval Strike Released!
I just checked that and it's true. For some reason the US side have 6 vehicles from the beginning while China only has 4.Hgx wrote:DICE and their incredible knowledge about balancing that goes outside human boundaries.
With this, I present you (and I hope that the guy who posted this made a mistake somewhere):
@Reddit:
On Carrier Assault Large on Lost Islands the US side has 1 extra attack boat and a Little Bird. Needless to say, this puts the China side in a very unbalanced situation every time.
http://imgur.com/a/OHnIz
DICE just reached a new level on patch testing.
Someone must have forgot to add the extra boat or it was never meant to be!
BF3C4 • STAR • Infantry Specialist 
BF3C5 • KART • Infantry Private 1st Class
BF3C6 • UNSC • Infantry Specialist
BF4C1 • Allies • Sergeant of the Legionnaires Division
BF4C2 • GoCI • Infantry Corporal
BF4C3 • LN7 • Infantry 2 of Clubs
BF4C4 • SAD • Special Programs • Very Special Agent
BF4C5 • Virtucon • Meat Helmets • Private 1st Class
BF4C6 • SAD • 1st Battalion • Field Agent
BF4C7 • GC • Armor • Master Sergeant
BF3C5 • KART • Infantry Private 1st Class
BF3C6 • UNSC • Infantry Specialist
BF4C1 • Allies • Sergeant of the Legionnaires Division
BF4C2 • GoCI • Infantry Corporal
BF4C3 • LN7 • Infantry 2 of Clubs
BF4C4 • SAD • Special Programs • Very Special Agent
BF4C5 • Virtucon • Meat Helmets • Private 1st Class
BF4C6 • SAD • 1st Battalion • Field Agent
BF4C7 • GC • Armor • Master Sergeant
Re: Naval Strike Released!
Suddenlly the fact I have lost 100% of my CN sides and 100% of my US sides makes sense.
Re: Naval Strike Released!
We have the same issue on Rogue Tranmission 64v with the MAA on Charlie flag and here we are 6 months later 
AC130 is way too OP/annoying, specially on Carrier assault on which you neither have an MAA or jets to deal with it. And since it covers the whole map, it basically means you are either spotted or under fire.
On CQ Large maps, the stealth jets is WAY more useful, specially for farming AC130, ACVs and people trying to use the old cannons
AC130 is way too OP/annoying, specially on Carrier assault on which you neither have an MAA or jets to deal with it. And since it covers the whole map, it basically means you are either spotted or under fire.
On CQ Large maps, the stealth jets is WAY more useful, specially for farming AC130, ACVs and people trying to use the old cannons
"Clubbing, drinking, dancing, glancing, flirting, winking, greeting, meeting, chatting, laughing, talking, walking, leaving, weaving, stumbling, fumbling, cabbing, asking, viewing, brewing, nuzzling, cuddling, feeling, reeling, kissing, twisting, touching, rushing, stripping, gripping, clutching, thrusting, bending, arching, gasping, slacking, melting, sleeping, waking, smelling…
Dirt?
Scrabbling, pounding, thumping, bumping, screaming, scratching, groping, choking, crying, gulping, stifling… quieting.
Breathing…breathing…breathing…
Re: Naval Strike Released!
The comment is priceless!
Welcome Committee Member
What is GC? | Getting Started at GC | Campaign Sign-up Video | FAQ | Forum Netiquette
New Members do you need help?
Find me on TS or send me a PM
Re: Naval Strike Released!
Vincent0k, the BF Community Manager, has been going around posting the following comment in all the threads involving Carrier Assault and the request for it's paradrop removal:
We may actually be getting Carrier Assault "fixed" by removing it's most lame feature. Knowing DICE it will be a few months before they all come to the conclusion that the thing people have been saying shouldn't be there since it was first announced should be removed. Either way though I'll definitely start playing CA again if they do give in and remove it as it really is the only thing keeping me from playing it due to the amount of cheese factor it has. How it ever got past anyone at the dev team in the first place as a good idea is beyond me.
Hi there and thanks for all of your feedback. The team is currently having discussion about Carrier Assault based on the input from our community.
We may actually be getting Carrier Assault "fixed" by removing it's most lame feature. Knowing DICE it will be a few months before they all come to the conclusion that the thing people have been saying shouldn't be there since it was first announced should be removed. Either way though I'll definitely start playing CA again if they do give in and remove it as it really is the only thing keeping me from playing it due to the amount of cheese factor it has. How it ever got past anyone at the dev team in the first place as a good idea is beyond me.
