Page 1 of 1
Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:57 pm
by A Docile Sloth
This is something I started working on back before BF4:C4 started. I did some runs using a program I wrote to simulate a campaign battle to test out the revamped C4 system. The idea was to turn this small program into a game that was the campaign system without the BF4 element. Then I got busy with Uni and stopped working on it. A few weeks ago I picked it back up again after about 4 months. Over the last couple of weeks I've been writing the main campaign part so that you can play it with friends or vs AI or AI vs AI. This video shows a what a year of playing C4 could have looked like as AI vs AI. There's still some issues with the AI reinforcing routine but I thought I'd share anyway.
Re: Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:50 pm
by Gwynzer
Why did Blue keep reinforcing the carribean???
Re: Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 3:58 pm
by A Docile Sloth
Because it's about halfway between the two HQs. When one of them is taken, all the divisions on the Caribbean move off.
Re: Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 5:38 pm
by nx-jojo
as a german - I like the size of germany!
Re: Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 5:52 pm
by CaptJagermeister
As a Dutch person where the hell is my country?
Re: Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 6:48 pm
by cancel_man
As an American - where are Dutch people even from?
This is fantastic Sloth! Really cool simulator!
Re: Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 7:49 pm
by Fields
As an american, I'm much too busy eating 10 cheesburgers to look at this.
Re: Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:01 pm
by Nix
As an Arizonian, why the feck is California ruling over my land?
Re: Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:56 pm
by RazY70
Pretty cool and accurate simulation Sloth. Blue apparently won on week 5 which is kind of consistent with our latest campaigns
I think people would've freaked out if they had to play a single campaign for a year.
Re: Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 3:29 am
by Necromancer
If only the armies moved the divisions as in the video… we would still be playing c4!
RazY70 wrote:
I think people would've freaked out if they had to play a single campaign for a year.
It can actually be a refreshing change from these 3-5 week ones.
Re: Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 11:07 am
by CaptJagermeister
cancel_man wrote:As an American - where are Dutch people even from?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... 29.svg.png
Re: Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 11:35 am
by Jokerle
In what language did you write it and why is it not on github?
Re: Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 11:54 am
by A Docile Sloth
Jokerle wrote:In what language did you write it
C++
Jokerle wrote:and why is it not on github?
Because it's still a bit broken (see the Caribbean and Blue) and there's some other stuff I need to add to make it people friendly.
Re: Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 8:18 am
by Fanne
We had this serveral times before ... but here you are
Re: Missing RISK in GC?
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 10:51 am
by A Docile Sloth
As it's apparently International Table Top Day, have a download of the current game. Still some edges to smooth off (and need to put stuff behind the "Extras" button) but the game bit works (99% of the time).
Download (3 MB). It's a .zip with a .exe and some .png . Just extract and run form where it is.
