Page 9 of 33
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 12:36 pm
by wizekraker
Next poll : should free cam be implemented?
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 12:38 pm
by Necromancer
Bock wrote:Is it possible to change one's vote?
For what it's worth, I think squad rush would be better and/or more fun for most people.
1) It's easier to make up strategies on the fly (which would benefit random squads) because
2) You play in closer proximity to your squadmates/objectives aren't so spread out, therefore
3) You won't have one person watching highway on Grand Bazaar the whole game, therefore
4) It's somewhat less dependent on individual skill.
i don't vote because i don't care, but i see it differently bock.
for rush, its
1) harder to make strategies on the fly because the objective is known to both sides and all of its (3) routes.
3) you won't have one person watching highway on Grandbazaar but you will have the entier enemy team watch a single corridor, therefore
4) its somewhat more dependent on individual skill because you won't be able to take an objective if theres LoA sitting on it, and you can't go around it.
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 1:00 pm
by Chemical2
Necromancer wrote:Bock wrote:Is it possible to change one's vote?
For what it's worth, I think squad rush would be better and/or more fun for most people.
1) It's easier to make up strategies on the fly (which would benefit random squads) because
2) You play in closer proximity to your squadmates/objectives aren't so spread out, therefore
3) You won't have one person watching highway on Grand Bazaar the whole game, therefore
4) It's somewhat less dependent on individual skill.
i don't vote because i don't care, but i see it differently bock.
for rush, its
1) harder to make strategies on the fly because the objective is known to both sides and all of its (3) routes.
3) you won't have one person watching highway on Grandbazaar but you will have the entier enemy team watch a single corridor, therefore
4) its somewhat more dependent on individual skill because you won't be able to take an objective if theres LoA sitting on it, and you can't go around it.
1) I don't think it is harder but 5v5 has indeed more options.
2) Both depend on your strategie.
3) Individual skill will always be a factor and since the maps are a bit bigger and the teams too it will play a smaller roll but i don't think we should let it stop us.
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW
Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 2:03 pm
by RazY70
Honestly it doesn't really matter to me which game mode we're playing as long as it's fun and not taken too seriously. I prefer CQ simply because it's more familiar to me and therefore more enjoyable
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 3:33 pm
by LoA
wizekraker wrote:Next poll : should free cam be implemented?
Next question: Why not?
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 NEW SIGN UPS IN OP! Vote in POLL #3
Posted: Mon May 13, 2013 4:06 pm
by wizekraker
LoA wrote:wizekraker wrote:Next poll : should free cam be implemented?
Next question: Why not?
I dont have problem with it..other might though.
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 7:20 pm
by haruky
This is a really really close poll. I'm going to leave it running for a few more days.
On the other hand, please continue signing up! We have nearly 50 votes but only about 25 people signed up. It takes literally 10 seconds. (All I ask is for your name)
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1lvnPxA ... 54fGo/edit
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 7:26 pm
by V_
Is this form different from the original one? Also, says I need permission to read it.
Can we get the option to change our votes? I wanna change mine from Conquest to Rush.
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 7:43 pm
by haruky
BlackIce wrote:Is this form different from the original one? Also, says I need permission to read it.
Can we get the option to change our votes? I wanna change mine from Conquest to Rush.
It is officialy 25-25 on conquest and rush then.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1lvnPxA ... 54fGo/edit Here's the form. I made a small oopsies.
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 8:35 pm
by Juffalo
Have we had a discussion about 4v4 vs 5v5 for conquest (which it looks like we'll be doing)
5v5 is probably better suited to conquest. I believe that is the competitive standard.
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 9:03 pm
by haruky
Juffalo wrote:Have we had a discussion about 4v4 vs 5v5 for conquest (which it looks like we'll be doing)
5v5 is probably better suited to conquest. I believe that is the competitive standard.
Not yet.
So far we have 25 for Conquest and 26 for Squad Rush (2 people changed their vote from Conquest to Squad Rush)
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 3:54 am
by undrt0w
any decision on the date? is it going to be on the 25th or 1st of June?
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:32 pm
by MisterInsane
Why am not in the sign-ups ?I so much want to play 5v5 with you guys
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:59 pm
by wizekraker
Yeah same here, I signed up and yet..
Re: GC 4v4 Tournament #4 - WE NEED MORE PLAYERS. SIGN UP NOW
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 3:23 pm
by Jokerle
und3rt0w wrote:any decision on the date? is it going to be on the 25th or 1st of June?